Subtitle: “Speciesism in relation to agricultural science.”
Paragraph 1: The Limits of Human Language
Language is one of humanity’s greatest achievements, allowing us to communicate complex ideas and share knowledge. However, language is inherently human-centered, shaped by our experiences and biases. Certain words carry negative connotations by design, framing aspects of nature in a way that reflects human values rather than objective reality.
Take the word “mold”, for example. In everyday usage, it often conjures images of decay or contamination, something to be avoided or eradicated. Yet in nature, mold plays a crucial role in the life cycle. It breaks down organic material, enriching the soil and enabling new growth. This process of decomposition is not inherently “bad”; it’s a necessary step in the continuous cycle of life on Earth.
Thus, when our ideas are written and communicated through human language, they can be limited by these biases. If agricultural science is to truly embrace a holistic view of nature, we must acknowledge these limitations and seek ways to transcend them.
Read more at Medium